Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
Price$42.92
Change-$0.06 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.37B
American Funds New World R5
Price$89.30
Change+$0.19 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.85B
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. FEMKX (7.37B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (1.09) vs FEMKX (0.62). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (35 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). FEMKX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FEMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.09 vs. FEMKX (8.96). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.41 vs. FEMKX (26.14).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.868 | 15.338 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.37B | 69.8B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.09 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.96 | 12.09 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.11 | 38.93 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.14 | 33.41 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.82 | 67.19 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement