Ad is loading...
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
Price$35.86
Change+$2.17 (+6.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.94B
American Funds New World R5
Price$74.56
Change+$3.88 (+5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.68B
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 55.7B vs. FEMKX (6.94B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (1.17) vs FEMKX (0.66). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (34 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). FEMKX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FEMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). RNWFX (-10.37) and FEMKX (-10.60) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.34 vs. FEMKX (18.12).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.528 | -8.517 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.94B | 55.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.60 | -10.37 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.51 | -4.49 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.12 | 26.34 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.20 | 27.87 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...