Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
Price$44.63
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.08B
American Funds New World R5
Price$91.55
Change+$0.20 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. FEMKX (8.08B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (1.04) vs FEMKX (0.57). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (35 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). FEMKX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FEMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. FEMKX (12.82). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.26 vs. FEMKX (19.73).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.096 | 18.496 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.08B | 71.4B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.04 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.82 | 14.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.24 | 33.07 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.73 | 28.26 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.71 | 80.61 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement