Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets
Price$49.27
Change+$0.28 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9B
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.33B
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. FEMKX (9B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (0.97) vs FEMKX (0.52). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (35 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). FEMKX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FEMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.59 vs. RNWFX (13.14). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.96 vs. FEMKX (25.93).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.650 | 25.058 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9B | 75.3B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.97 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.59 | 13.14 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.98 | 58.44 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.93 | 31.96 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.61 | 95.90 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement