Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
Price$43.97
Change-$0.11 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.52
Change-$0.42 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. FEMKX (7.99B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (1.04) vs FEMKX (0.58). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (35 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). FEMKX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FEMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. FEMKX (14.77). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.24 vs. FEMKX (21.18).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.467 | 17.163 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 70.8B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.04 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.77 | 16.21 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.05 | 40.68 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.18 | 30.24 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.81 | 74.70 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement