Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
Price$44.89
Change+$0.28 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.27B
American Funds New World R5
Price$92.38
Change+$0.37 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. FEMKX (8.27B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (1.01) vs FEMKX (0.56). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (35 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). FEMKX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FEMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.77 vs. RNWFX (17.03). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.56 vs. FEMKX (18.34).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.148 | 19.091 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.27B | 71.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.01 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.77 | 17.03 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.32 | 39.12 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.34 | 27.56 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.48 | 93.15 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement