Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FEMKX (11.5B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (1.20) vs FEMKX (0.04). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (36 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FEMKX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEMKX (31.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.71 vs. RNWFX (23.90). FEMKX return over 5 years is better than : 29.46 vs. RNWFX (16.08).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.338 | 14.186 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 90.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.71 | 23.90 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.76 | 50.35 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.46 | 16.08 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.17 | 124.88 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers