Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FEMKX (11.7B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (1.19) vs FEMKX (0.04). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (36 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FEMKX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEMKX (31.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.91 vs. RNWFX (14.59). FEMKX return over 5 years is better than : 25.97 vs. RNWFX (12.61).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.212 | 8.253 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 90.7B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.19 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.91 | 14.59 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.92 | 36.70 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.97 | 12.61 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.88 | 98.84 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement