Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FEMKX (10.8B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (1.22) vs FEMKX (0.04). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (36 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FEMKX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEMKX (31.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.53 vs. RNWFX (22.59). FEMKX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. RNWFX (23.78).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.674 | 17.094 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 88.6B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.22 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.53 | 22.59 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.88 | 56.61 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.39 | 23.78 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.27 | 111.30 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers