Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMMX vs RNWHX
FEMMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEMMX vs RNWHX
FEMMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FEMMX (11.7B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FEMMX: RNWHX (1.14) vs FEMMX (0.00). FEMMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEMMX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FEMMX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEMMX (31.00). FEMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEMMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.60 vs. RNWHX (19.47). FEMMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.54 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| FEMMX | RNWHX | FEMMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.72 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.72 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.540 | 12.651 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 90.7B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.60 | 19.47 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.39 | 43.67 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.54 | 14.04 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 550.28 | 107.31 | 513% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement