Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMMX vs RNWHX
FEMMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEMMX vs RNWHX
FEMMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FEMMX (10.8B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FEMMX: RNWHX (1.17) vs FEMMX (0.00). FEMMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEMMX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FEMMX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEMMX (31.00). FEMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEMMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.06 vs. RNWHX (21.78). FEMMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.85 vs. RNWHX (17.87).
| FEMMX | RNWHX | FEMMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.72 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.72 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.573 | 13.978 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 90.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.06 | 21.78 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.96 | 44.40 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.85 | 17.87 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 515.34 | 107.97 | 477% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement