Intraday BUY SELL Signals
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMS vs ONT
FEMS vs ONT Comparison
Open Charts FEMS vs ONT
FEMS vs ONT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMS vs. ONT commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMS is a Hold and ONT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONT: Fundamental Ratings
ONT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FEMS | ONT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 27 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FEMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FEMS has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FEMS jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FEMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEMS | 100% | N/A | ||
| INTR - FEMS | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| Q - FEMS | 43% Loosely correlated | -7.58% | ||
| MSM - FEMS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| TU - FEMS | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| ONT - FEMS | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||
ONT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ONT and CLH have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONT and CLH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONT | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| CLH - ONT | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| NVRI - ONT | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.71% | ||
| ABAT - ONT | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LNZA - ONT | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WCN - ONT | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.50% | ||
More | ||||