Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMSX vs RNWFX
FEMSX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMSX vs RNWFX
FEMSX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMSX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMSX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FEMSX (33.9B). FEMSX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: FEMSX (1.90) vs RNWFX (1.20). FEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMSX (18 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). RNWFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FEMSX (0.02). RNWFX (46.00) and FEMSX (45.00) have comparable annual turnover. FEMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMSX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FEMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.88 vs. RNWFX (28.87). FEMSX return over 5 years is better than : 34.54 vs. RNWFX (20.67).
| FEMSX | RNWFX | FEMSX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.62 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 0.62 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.830 | 17.340 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.9B | 90.9B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.20 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.88 | 28.87 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.63 | 52.28 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.54 | 20.67 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.52 | 129.80 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement