| FENY | PWER | FENY / PWER | |
| Gain YTD | 47.878 | 34.129 | 140% |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 13M | 16,462% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.79 | 11% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 31.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 2.19 | 0.73 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 3 years | - |
| FENY | PWER | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 21 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DBL | 14.17 | 0.02 | +0.14% |
| Doubleline Opportunistic Credit Fund | |||
| JLQD | 40.13 | N/A | N/A |
| Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| QLTA | 46.13 | -0.07 | -0.15% |
| iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| TVE | 23.41 | -0.04 | -0.17% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029 | |||
| BKF | 40.11 | -0.38 | -0.94% |
| iShares MSCI BIC ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FENY has been closely correlated with XOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FENY jumps, then XOM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FENY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FENY | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| XOM - FENY | 89% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| CVX - FENY | 89% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| COP - FENY | 89% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| EOG - FENY | 85% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| OVV - FENY | 85% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that PWER and NPWR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PWER and NPWR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWER | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWER | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| NPWR - PWER | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
| RUN - PWER | 13% Poorly correlated | -4.56% | ||
| SEDG - PWER | 13% Poorly correlated | -3.35% | ||
| EAF - PWER | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
| OXY - PWER | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||