Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEQMX vs RNWHX
FEQMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FEQMX vs RNWHX
FEQMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FEQMX (11.5B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FEQMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FEQMX (0.00). FEQMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FEQMX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FEQMX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEQMX (31.00). FEQMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FEQMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FEQMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.30 vs. RNWHX (31.15). FEQMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.43 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| FEQMX | RNWHX | FEQMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.565 | 18.743 | 147% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 90.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.30 | 31.15 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.11 | 57.37 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.43 | 20.21 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement