FER
Price
$52.32
Change
-$0.52 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
37.78B
MTZ
Price
$168.77
Change
-$0.55 (-0.32%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
13.36B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FER vs MTZ

Header iconFER vs MTZ Comparison
Open Charts FER vs MTZBanner chart's image
Ferrovial S.E
Price$52.32
Change-$0.52 (-0.98%)
Volume$148.05K
Capitalization37.78B
MasTec
Price$168.77
Change-$0.55 (-0.32%)
Volume$934.59K
Capitalization13.36B
FER vs MTZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FER vs. MTZ commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FER is a StrongBuy and MTZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FER: $52.32 vs. MTZ: $168.77)
Brand notoriety: FER: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FER: 96% vs. MTZ: 112%
Market capitalization -- FER: $37.78B vs. MTZ: $13.36B
FER [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $37.78B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $13.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FER’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FER’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FER and MTZ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FER’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FER’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FER is a better buy in the short-term than MTZ.

Price Growth

FER (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +303.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FER is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.29% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FER($37.8B) has a higher market cap than MTZ($13.4B). MTZ has higher P/E ratio than FER: MTZ (62.05) vs FER (10.03). FER (24.483) and MTZ (23.968) have similar YTD gains . FER has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.54B vs. MTZ (960M). FER has more cash in the bank: 3.64B vs. MTZ (346M). MTZ has less debt than FER: MTZ (2.63B) vs FER (11.9B). MTZ has higher revenues than FER: MTZ (12.5B) vs FER (9.15B).
FERMTZFER / MTZ
Capitalization37.8B13.4B282%
EBITDA4.54B960M473%
Gain YTD24.48323.968102%
P/E Ratio10.0362.0516%
Revenue9.15B12.5B73%
Total Cash3.64B346M1,052%
Total Debt11.9B2.63B452%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FERMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BITX59.591.62
+2.79%
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF
FLCA41.860.24
+0.58%
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
SMLL22.060.12
+0.55%
Harbor Active Small Cap ETF
SCJ84.450.03
+0.04%
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
EFAS18.10-0.09
-0.49%
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF

FER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FER and GVA have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FER and GVA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FER
1D Price
Change %
FER100%
-0.98%
GVA - FER
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
MTZ - FER
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
ACM - FER
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
AMRC - FER
29%
Poorly correlated
+8.03%
APG - FER
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then EME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
-0.32%
EME - MTZ
87%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
FIX - MTZ
85%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
PWR - MTZ
84%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
PRIM - MTZ
82%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
STRL - MTZ
79%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
More