FER
Price
$59.80
Change
-$0.18 (-0.30%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
42.5B
MTZ
Price
$215.81
Change
+$0.41 (+0.19%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.03B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FER vs MTZ

Header iconFER vs MTZ Comparison
Open Charts FER vs MTZBanner chart's image
Ferrovial S.E
Price$59.80
Change-$0.18 (-0.30%)
Volume$893.05K
Capitalization42.5B
MasTec
Price$215.81
Change+$0.41 (+0.19%)
Volume$811.85K
Capitalization17.03B
FER vs MTZ Comparison Chart in %
FER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FER vs. MTZ commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FER is a Buy and MTZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FER: $59.80 vs. MTZ: $215.81)
Brand notoriety: FER: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FER: 199% vs. MTZ: 83%
Market capitalization -- FER: $42.5B vs. MTZ: $17.03B
FER [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $42.5B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $17.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FER’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FER’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FER is a better buy in the long-term than MTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FER’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FER’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTZ is a better buy in the short-term than FER.

Price Growth

FER (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +5.75% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +291.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.53% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FER($42.5B) has a higher market cap than MTZ($17B). MTZ has higher P/E ratio than FER: MTZ (64.11) vs FER (11.06). MTZ YTD gains are higher at: 58.521 vs. FER (42.279). FER has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.59B vs. MTZ (978M). FER has more cash in the bank: 2.84B vs. MTZ (191M). MTZ has less debt than FER: MTZ (2.67B) vs FER (10.3B). MTZ has higher revenues than FER: MTZ (13B) vs FER (9.35B).
FERMTZFER / MTZ
Capitalization42.5B17B250%
EBITDA4.59B978M469%
Gain YTD42.27958.52172%
P/E Ratio11.0664.1117%
Revenue9.35B13B72%
Total Cash2.84B191M1,484%
Total Debt10.3B2.67B386%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FERMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FER
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFLV33.120.24
+0.73%
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
BCDF31.970.09
+0.27%
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Dev ETF
PSTP34.820.01
+0.03%
Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Stgy ETF
CMBS49.110.01
+0.02%
iShares CMBS ETF
PQJL28.35-0.05
-0.18%
PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JULY

FER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FER has been loosely correlated with GVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FER jumps, then GVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FER
1D Price
Change %
FER100%
-0.30%
GVA - FER
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
STN - FER
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
MTZ - FER
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
ACM - FER
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
ACA - FER
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
+0.19%
PWR - MTZ
83%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
EME - MTZ
83%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
FIX - MTZ
80%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
PRIM - MTZ
77%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
STRL - MTZ
76%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More