Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWBX
FERGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWBX
FERGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FERGX (3.63B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FERGX (2.27) vs RNWBX (0.42). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FERGX (11 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FERGX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.64 vs. RNWBX (20.43). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.34 vs. RNWBX (12.95).
| FERGX | RNWBX | FERGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 1.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 1.66 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.991 | 13.344 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.63B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 0.42 | 537% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.64 | 20.43 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.43 | 39.93 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.34 | 12.95 | 327% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.15 | 98.57 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers