Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWBX
FERGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWBX
FERGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FERGX (3.87B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FERGX (2.13) vs RNWBX (0.41). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FERGX (11 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FERGX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.13 vs. RNWBX (18.14). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.26 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| FERGX | RNWBX | FERGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 1.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 1.66 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.588 | 12.082 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.87B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.41 | 515% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.13 | 18.14 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.38 | 39.22 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.26 | 9.30 | 444% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.30 | 97.97 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement