Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWBX
FERGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWBX
FERGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FERGX (4.67B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FERGX (2.14) vs RNWBX (0.41). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FERGX (10 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FERGX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.09 vs. RNWBX (29.69). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. RNWBX (15.20).
| FERGX | RNWBX | FERGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 1.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 1.66 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.398 | 18.201 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.67B | 90.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 0.41 | 517% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.09 | 29.69 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.26 | 52.51 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 15.20 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.71 | 122.04 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement