Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWFX
FERGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWFX
FERGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FERGX (3.87B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: FERGX (2.13) vs RNWFX (1.19). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FERGX (11 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). RNWFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FERGX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.13 vs. RNWFX (19.68). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.26 vs. RNWFX (14.77).
| FERGX | RNWFX | FERGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.62 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 0.62 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.588 | 12.700 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.87B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.19 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.13 | 19.68 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.38 | 44.28 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.26 | 14.77 | 279% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.30 | 110.07 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement