Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWFX
FERGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWFX
FERGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FERGX (4.67B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: FERGX (2.14) vs RNWFX (1.20). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FERGX (10 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). RNWFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FERGX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.09 vs. RNWFX (31.39). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| FERGX | RNWFX | FERGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.62 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 0.62 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.398 | 18.794 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.67B | 90.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.20 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.09 | 31.39 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.26 | 58.06 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 20.98 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.71 | 135.60 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement