Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWFX
FERGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWFX
FERGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FERGX (4.56B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: FERGX (2.16) vs RNWFX (1.20). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FERGX (11 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). RNWFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FERGX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.07 vs. RNWFX (17.39). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.24 vs. RNWFX (18.43).
| FERGX | RNWFX | FERGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.62 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 0.62 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.553 | 16.517 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 90B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 1.20 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.07 | 17.39 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.26 | 54.50 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.24 | 18.43 | 251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.77 | 114.22 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement