Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWHX
FERGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWHX
FERGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FERGX (3.87B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FERGX (2.13) vs RNWHX (1.14). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FERGX (11 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). RNWHX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FERGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.13 vs. RNWHX (19.47). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.26 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| FERGX | RNWHX | FERGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.72 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 0.72 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.588 | 12.651 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.87B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.14 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.13 | 19.47 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.38 | 43.67 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.26 | 14.04 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.30 | 107.31 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement