Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWHX
FERGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWHX
FERGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FERGX (4.56B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FERGX (2.16) vs RNWHX (1.15). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FERGX (11 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). RNWHX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FERGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.07 vs. RNWHX (17.19). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.24 vs. RNWHX (17.68).
| FERGX | RNWHX | FERGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.72 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 0.72 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.553 | 16.447 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.56B | 90B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 1.15 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.07 | 17.19 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.26 | 53.84 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.24 | 17.68 | 262% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.77 | 111.44 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers