Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWHX
FERGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWHX
FERGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FERGX (4.67B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FERGX (2.14) vs RNWHX (1.15). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FERGX (10 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). RNWHX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FERGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.09 vs. RNWHX (31.15). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| FERGX | RNWHX | FERGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.72 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 0.72 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.398 | 18.743 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.67B | 90.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.15 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.09 | 31.15 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.26 | 57.37 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 20.21 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.71 | 132.48 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement