Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FERGX vs RNWHX
FERGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FERGX vs RNWHX
FERGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FERGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERGX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FERGX (3.63B). FERGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FERGX (2.27) vs RNWHX (1.17). FERGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FERGX (11 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). RNWHX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FERGX (0.13). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FERGX (20.00). FERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FERGX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.64 vs. RNWHX (21.78). FERGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.34 vs. RNWHX (17.87).
| FERGX | RNWHX | FERGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.72 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 0.72 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.991 | 13.978 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.63B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 1.17 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.64 | 21.78 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.43 | 44.40 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.34 | 17.87 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.15 | 107.97 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement