Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FESMX vs FTHFX
FESMX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts FESMX vs FTHFX
FESMX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FESMX (81.3M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than FESMX: FTHFX (0.59) vs FESMX (0.33). FESMX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: FESMX (4 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FESMX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FESMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.26 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FESMX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FESMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.83 vs. FTHFX (30.99).
| FESMX | FTHFX | FESMX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.64 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.64 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.078 | 12.922 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.3M | 11.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.59 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.83 | 30.99 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.07 | 61.63 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 61.64 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 248.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FKCSX | 37.79 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap C | |||
| ARSIX | 15.56 | N/A | N/A |
| AMG River Road Small Cap Value I | |||
| VRVIX | 414.73 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index I | |||
| LSSCX | 24.06 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Instl | |||
| PFPGX | 29.11 | -0.37 | -1.26% |
| Parnassus Growth Equity Institutional | |||