Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEYCX vs RGWBX
FEYCX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FEYCX vs RGWBX
FEYCX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEYCX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEYCX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. FEYCX (6.97B). FEYCX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FEYCX (0.48) vs RGWBX (0.00). FEYCX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FEYCX (20 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). FEYCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). FEYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). FEYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGWBX: FEYCX (0) vs RGWBX (250). FEYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.68 vs. RGWBX (7.68). FEYCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.72 vs. RGWBX (15.32).
| FEYCX | RGWBX | FEYCX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.46 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.46 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.956 | 6.821 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.97B | 28.2B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.68 | 7.68 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.43 | 42.83 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.72 | 15.32 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.28 | 96.04 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement