Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs JSGBX
FFAFX vs JSGBX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs JSGBX
FFAFX vs JSGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAFX vs. JSGBX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAFX is a Hold and JSGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. JSGBX (3.45B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than JSGBX: FFAFX (0.45) vs JSGBX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than JSGBX: FFAFX (6 years) vs JSGBX (15 years). JSGBX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). JSGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). JSGBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: JSGBX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. JSGBX (-2.17). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.94 vs. JSGBX (13.83).
| FFAFX | JSGBX | FFAFX / JSGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.58 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.59 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.763 | 3.878 | 303% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 3.45B | 10,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | -2.17 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.30 | 50.23 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.94 | 13.83 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement