Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs KCGSX
FFAFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$86.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$24.35
Change+$0.18 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.47M
FFAFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. KCGSX (266M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: FFAFX (0.53) vs KCGSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: FFAFX (5 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: KCGSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. FFAFX (7.25). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.44 vs. FFAFX (36.98).
| FFAFX | KCGSX | FFAFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.078 | 16.370 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 266M | 122,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 16.09 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.80 | 94.77 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.98 | 48.44 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 142.75 | - |