Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs KCGSX
FFAFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.71
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$24.48
Change+$0.14 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.99M
FFAFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. KCGSX (277M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: FFAFX (0.55) vs KCGSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: FFAFX (5 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: KCGSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.49 vs. FFAFX (11.67).
| FFAFX | KCGSX | FFAFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.965 | 17.188 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 277M | 121,300% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.67 | 19.49 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.07 | 105.74 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 48.84 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 152.78 | - |