Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs KLCSX
FFAFX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$86.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$22.01
Change+$0.13 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
FFAFX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. KLCSX (1.24B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: FFAFX (0.53) vs KLCSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: FFAFX (5 years) vs KLCSX (12 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: KLCSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. KLCSX (-12.28). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.98 vs. KLCSX (-37.72).
| FFAFX | KLCSX | FFAFX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.78 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.87 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.078 | 17.638 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 1.24B | 26,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | -12.28 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.80 | -14.66 | -442% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.98 | -37.72 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.70 | - |