Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs KLCSX
FFAFX vs KLCSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs KLCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.39
Change+$0.60 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R6
Price$22.56
Change+$0.25 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
FFAFX vs KLCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. KLCSX (1.31B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: FFAFX (0.55) vs KLCSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCSX: FFAFX (5 years) vs KLCSX (12 years). KLCSX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: KLCSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.66 vs. KLCSX (-7.39).
| FFAFX | KLCSX | FFAFX / KLCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.78 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.87 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.472 | 20.577 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 1.31B | 26,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.66 | -7.39 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.55 | -10.76 | -665% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -34.99 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.80 | - |