Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGRNX
FFAFX vs LGRNX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGRNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$85.92
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Loomis Sayles Growth N
Price$33.09
Change+$0.11 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.67B
FFAFX vs LGRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. LGRNX (17.7B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGRNX: FFAFX (0.57) vs LGRNX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGRNX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGRNX (13 years). LGRNX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRNX (10.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRNX: FFAFX (250) vs LGRNX (1000000). LGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.85 vs. FFAFX (16.16).
| FFAFX | LGRNX | FFAFX / LGRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.57 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.57 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.795 | 11.194 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 17.7B | 1,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.16 | 20.85 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.58 | 64.74 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 41.55 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 212.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement