Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGRNX
FFAFX vs LGRNX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGRNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.78
Change+$0.98 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.42B
Loomis Sayles Growth N
Price$33.33
Change+$0.30 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.77B
FFAFX vs LGRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 331B vs. LGRNX (17.8B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGRNX: FFAFX (0.53) vs LGRNX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGRNX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGRNX (13 years). LGRNX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRNX (10.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRNX: FFAFX (250) vs LGRNX (1000000). LGRNX (7.93) and FFAFX (7.80) have marching annual gain over last year. LGRNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. FFAFX (36.19).
| FFAFX | LGRNX | FFAFX / LGRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.57 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.57 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.302 | 12.374 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331B | 17.8B | 1,860% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | 7.93 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.11 | 68.33 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.19 | 41.95 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 187.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement