Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWAWX
FFAFX vs NWAWX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWAWX
FFAFX vs NWAWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NWAWX (386M). NWAWX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: NWAWX (2.52) vs FFAFX (0.44). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWAWX: FFAFX (6 years) vs NWAWX (5 years). NWAWX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). NWAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.65 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAWX: FFAFX (250) vs NWAWX (50000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.45 vs. NWAWX (-0.75). NWAWX return over 5 years is better than : 34.19 vs. FFAFX (21.27).
| FFAFX | NWAWX | FFAFX / NWAWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.74 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.83 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.856 | 2.847 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 386M | 93,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 2.52 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.45 | -0.75 | -1,666% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.93 | 20.92 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.27 | 34.19 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement