Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs POGRX
FFAFX vs POGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs POGRX
FFAFX vs POGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. POGRX (6.33B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than POGRX: FFAFX (0.45) vs POGRX (0.38). FFAFX was incepted earlier than POGRX: FFAFX (6 years) vs POGRX (22 years). POGRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. POGRX (11.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than POGRX: FFAFX (250) vs POGRX (2000). POGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.50 vs. FFAFX (4.65). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.04 vs. POGRX (-2.72).
| FFAFX | POGRX | FFAFX / POGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.66 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.66 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.309 | 27.404 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 6.33B | 5,639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.38 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 24.50 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.62 | 23.61 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.04 | -2.72 | -663% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement