Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs POGRX
FFAFX vs POGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs POGRX
FFAFX vs POGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAFX vs. POGRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAFX is a Buy and POGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. POGRX (6.08B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than POGRX: FFAFX (0.45) vs POGRX (0.40). FFAFX was incepted earlier than POGRX: FFAFX (6 years) vs POGRX (22 years). POGRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. POGRX (11.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than POGRX: FFAFX (250) vs POGRX (2000). POGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. FFAFX (0.40). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.29 vs. POGRX (-7.06).
| FFAFX | POGRX | FFAFX / POGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.66 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.66 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.280 | 23.372 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 6.08B | 5,806% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.40 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | 10.04 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.24 | 18.37 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.29 | -7.06 | -217% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement