Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs QGRPX
FFAFX vs QGRPX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs QGRPX
FFAFX vs QGRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAFX vs. QGRPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAFX is a Buy and QGRPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. QGRPX (295M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than QGRPX: FFAFX (0.45) vs QGRPX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than QGRPX: FFAFX (6 years) vs QGRPX (6 years). QGRPX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. QGRPX (30.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QGRPX: FFAFX (250) vs QGRPX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. QGRPX (-3.66). QGRPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.29 vs. FFAFX (15.29).
| FFAFX | QGRPX | FFAFX / QGRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.65 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.79 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.280 | 1.228 | 756% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 295M | 119,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | -3.66 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.24 | 47.74 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.29 | 38.29 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement