Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RGAGX
FFAFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RGAGX
FFAFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX (361B) and RGAGX (361B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RGAGX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FFAFX (0.44). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FFAFX (6 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FFAFX (0.34) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FFAFX (32.00) and RGAGX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFAFX (250) and RGAGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. FFAFX (8.94). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. FFAFX (17.76).
| FFAFX | RGAGX | FFAFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.29 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.29 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.486 | 8.887 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 361B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.51 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 12.55 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.67 | 50.34 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.76 | 20.99 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement