Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RGAHX
FFAFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RGAHX
FFAFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX (353B) and RGAHX (353B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FFAFX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: FFAFX (0.45) vs RGAHX (0.40). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FFAFX (6 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RGAHX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX (32.00) and RGAHX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFAFX (250) and RGAHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. RGAHX (0.18). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.29 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| FFAFX | RGAHX | FFAFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.44 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.44 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.280 | 9.200 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 353B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.40 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | 0.18 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.24 | 43.47 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.29 | 13.78 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement