Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RGEBX
FFAFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RGEBX
FFAFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX (361B) and RGEBX (361B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FFAFX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FFAFX (0.45) vs RGEBX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FFAFX (6 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX (32.00) and RGEBX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFAFX (250) and RGEBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. RGEBX (5.16). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.94 vs. RGEBX (12.23).
| FFAFX | RGEBX | FFAFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.08 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.08 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.033 | 7.631 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 361B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 5.16 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 40.43 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.94 | 12.23 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement