Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$85.92
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.50
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.15M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. SBHAX (92.2M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.57) vs SBHAX (0.21). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.16 vs. SBHAX (-10.30).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.93 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.795 | 4.506 | 351% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 92.2M | 355,748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.21 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.16 | -10.30 | -157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.58 | 0.62 | 9,156% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 6.43 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement