Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$67.61
Change+$1.47 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.66B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$17.87
Change+$0.32 (+1.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.22M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. SBHAX (85.2M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.68) vs SBHAX (0.23). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (4 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SBHAX (21.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.09 vs. SBHAX (-15.86).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.863 | -10.138 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 85.2M | 307,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.23 | 301% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.09 | -15.86 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.09 | -15.30 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.86 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...