Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$77.99
Change-$0.28 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.93B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$19.43
Change-$0.08 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.7M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. SBHAX (91.7M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.62) vs SBHAX (0.22). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. SBHAX (-11.98).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.93 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.485 | -0.512 | -1,071% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 91.7M | 334,787% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.22 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | -11.98 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.96 | 6.24 | 929% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 13.86 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement