Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.47
Change-$0.58 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.90
Change-$0.12 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.78M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. SBHAX (91.8M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.55) vs SBHAX (0.20). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.44 vs. SBHAX (-8.18).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.93 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.232 | 7.629 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 91.8M | 371,460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.20 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.44 | -8.18 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 13.16 | 584% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 8.89 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement