Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$69.07
Change-$1.26 (-1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.01B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$17.98
Change-$0.25 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.23M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. SBHAX (91.2M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.63) vs SBHAX (0.22). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (4 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SBHAX (21.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.31 vs. SBHAX (-14.97).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.914 | -6.759 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 91.2M | 305,921% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.22 | 292% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | -14.97 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.64 | -11.77 | -167% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 28.29 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...