Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAFX vs. SBHAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAFX is a Buy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. SBHAX (44.7M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.45) vs SBHAX (0.05). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (6 years) vs SBHAX (13 years). SBHAX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. SBHAX (-10.79). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.29 vs. SBHAX (-28.47).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.84 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.97 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.280 | 12.951 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 44.7M | 789,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.05 | 916% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | -10.79 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.24 | -5.13 | -862% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.29 | -28.47 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement