Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBRAX
FFAFX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$85.67
Change-$0.60 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$20.48
Change-$0.18 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.06M
FFAFX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. SBRAX (84.1M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBRAX: FFAFX (0.53) vs SBRAX (0.19). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.46 vs. SBRAX (-12.32). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. SBRAX (1.76).
| FFAFX | SBRAX | FFAFX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.56 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.458 | 5.949 | 260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 84.1M | 388,823% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.19 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.46 | -12.32 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.91 | 4.21 | 1,518% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.80 | 1.76 | 2,034% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |