Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBRAX
FFAFX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.94
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$20.22
Change-$0.07 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.44M
FFAFX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. SBRAX (92.4M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBRAX: FFAFX (0.57) vs SBRAX (0.20). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. SBRAX (-9.48).
| FFAFX | SBRAX | FFAFX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.56 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.474 | 4.051 | 357% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 92.4M | 356,061% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.20 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.02 | -9.48 | -158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.41 | -5.39 | -823% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 8.49 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement