Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs TCPWX
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$86.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$13.30
Change-$0.06 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. TCPWX (1.52B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than TCPWX: FFAFX (0.53) vs TCPWX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: FFAFX (5 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). TCPWX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: TCPWX (0) vs FFAFX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. FFAFX (7.25). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.98 vs. TCPWX (-40.94).
| FFAFX | TCPWX | FFAFX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.74 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.74 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.078 | 18.021 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 1.52B | 21,513% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 22.46 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.80 | 130.74 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.98 | -40.94 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |