Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs TCPWX
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$70.66
Change+$0.71 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$10.61
Change+$0.27 (+2.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. TCPWX (1.27B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than TCPWX: FFAFX (0.68) vs TCPWX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: FFAFX (4 years) vs TCPWX (5 years). TCPWX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: TCPWX (0) vs FFAFX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.41 vs. FFAFX (1.14).
| FFAFX | TCPWX | FFAFX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.73 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.73 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.771 | -8.657 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275B | 1.27B | 21,739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.14 | 26.41 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.29 | 4.34 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -0.19 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...