Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs TCPWX
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$69.33
Change+$1.72 (+2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.42B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$10.73
Change+$0.39 (+3.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. TCPWX (1.25B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than TCPWX: FFAFX (0.68) vs TCPWX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: FFAFX (4 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). TCPWX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: TCPWX (0) vs FFAFX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.64 vs. FFAFX (-3.09).
| FFAFX | TCPWX | FFAFX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.73 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.73 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.863 | -8.657 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 1.25B | 21,309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.09 | 34.64 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.09 | 26.56 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -22.89 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...