Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs WLGCX
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$66.69
Change-$3.97 (-5.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$21.92
Change-$0.94 (-4.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.79B
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. WLGCX (7.79B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: FFAFX (0.68) vs WLGCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: FFAFX (4 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (9.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: FFAFX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). WLGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. FFAFX (0.48).
| FFAFX | WLGCX | FFAFX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.74 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.771 | -6.003 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 7.79B | 3,596% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | 4.43 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.50 | -1.08 | -601% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 48.83 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.91 | - |