Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGCX
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$85.67
Change-$0.60 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$25.60
Change-$0.32 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.84B
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. WLGCX (7.84B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: FFAFX (0.53) vs WLGCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: FFAFX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.46 vs. WLGCX (3.02). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. WLGCX (12.13).
| FFAFX | WLGCX | FFAFX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.72 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.458 | 5.263 | 294% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 7.84B | 4,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.46 | 3.02 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.91 | 36.10 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.80 | 12.13 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.64 | - |