Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGCX
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.24
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$25.92
Change-$0.12 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WLGCX (8.05B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: FFAFX (0.56) vs WLGCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: FFAFX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.93 vs. WLGCX (8.77).
| FFAFX | WLGCX | FFAFX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.74 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.922 | 7.072 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 8.05B | 4,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.93 | 8.77 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.33 | 39.92 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 19.89 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement