Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WMKGX
FFAFX vs WMKGX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WMKGX
FFAFX vs WMKGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAFX vs. WMKGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAFX is a Buy and WMKGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. WMKGX (367M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WMKGX: FFAFX (0.45) vs WMKGX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WMKGX: FFAFX (6 years) vs WMKGX (29 years). WMKGX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WMKGX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKGX: FFAFX (250) vs WMKGX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. WMKGX (-0.28). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.29 vs. WMKGX (-8.53).
| FFAFX | WMKGX | FFAFX / WMKGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.14 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.14 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.280 | 14.182 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 367M | 96,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | -0.28 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.24 | 17.57 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.29 | -8.53 | -179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement