Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WOFRX
FFAFX vs WOFRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WOFRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$86.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Allspring Opportunity R6
Price$63.23
Change-$0.54 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
FFAFX vs WOFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. WOFRX (1.8B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WOFRX: FFAFX (0.53) vs WOFRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WOFRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WOFRX (5 years). WOFRX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WOFRX (20.00). WOFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: WOFRX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. WOFRX (-5.30). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.98 vs. WOFRX (11.69).
| FFAFX | WOFRX | FFAFX / WOFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.72 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.77 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.078 | 2.297 | 700% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 1.8B | 18,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | -5.30 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.80 | 21.53 | 301% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.98 | 11.69 | 316% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |