Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FFAMX (10.8B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (1.84) vs RLBAX (1.13). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.85). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. FFAMX (9.21). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.27 vs. FFAMX (16.34).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.32 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.971 | 9.474 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 283B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.13 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 9.93 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.32 | 39.04 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.34 | 28.27 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.67 | 74.50 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers