Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (1.91) vs RLBAX (1.14). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.85). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.18 vs. FFAMX (10.43). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.38 vs. FFAMX (16.61).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.32 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.32 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.901 | 9.663 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.14 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.43 | 13.18 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.69 | 40.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.61 | 31.38 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.65 | 77.44 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers