Ad is loading...
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$20.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.21B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.02
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. FFAMX (9.21B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (2.13) vs RLBAX (1.28). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.83). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.44 vs. RLBAX (3.92). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.45 vs. FFAMX (26.62).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.044 | 0.154 | 676% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.21B | 234B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.28 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.44 | 3.92 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.08 | 19.69 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.62 | 32.45 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.74 | 44.47 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...