Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$21.13
Change-$0.17 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.42B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. FFAMX (9.42B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (2.07) vs RLBAX (1.23). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.83). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. RLBAX (4.45). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.05 vs. FFAMX (25.52).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.201 | 4.085 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.42B | 244B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.23 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 4.45 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.98 | 30.02 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.52 | 34.05 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.32 | 51.23 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement