Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$22.07
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.62B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. FFAMX (9.62B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (2.04) vs RLBAX (1.17). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.83). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.36 vs. RLBAX (6.41). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.87 vs. FFAMX (22.77).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.282 | 9.479 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.62B | 255B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 1.17 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.36 | 6.41 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.95 | 31.65 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.77 | 32.87 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.90 | 64.80 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement