Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$22.56
Change-$0.07 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.56
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. FFAMX (9.97B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (1.95) vs RLBAX (1.10). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.83). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. RLBAX (9.12). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.04 vs. FFAMX (26.30).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.795 | 13.770 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.97B | 266B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 1.10 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 9.12 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.34 | 47.98 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.30 | 38.04 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.05 | 68.72 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement