Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$22.52
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.76B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.28
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. FFAMX (9.76B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (2.00) vs RLBAX (1.15). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.83). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFAMX (9.15) and RLBAX (9.12) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.86 vs. FFAMX (25.50).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.316 | 12.839 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.76B | 263B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.15 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | 9.12 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.41 | 40.57 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.50 | 37.86 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.58 | 71.58 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement