Ad is loading...
FFAMX vs RLBFX
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$20.49
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.21B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.44
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. FFAMX (9.21B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFAMX: RLBFX (2.26) vs FFAMX (2.13). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FFAMX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. FFAMX (4.24). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.47 vs. FFAMX (26.56).
| FFAMX | RLBFX | FFAMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.29 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.29 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.995 | 0.528 | 188% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.21B | 234B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 2.26 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 5.06 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.86 | 22.75 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.56 | 38.47 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.07 | 53.33 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...