Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBFX
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBFX
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFAMX: RLBFX (2.02) vs FFAMX (1.91). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FFAMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.97 vs. FFAMX (10.98). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.36 vs. FFAMX (16.81).
| FFAMX | RLBFX | FFAMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.30 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.132 | 9.027 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 2.02 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.98 | 13.97 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.75 | 44.03 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.81 | 36.36 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.10 | 92.43 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers