Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBFX
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$21.71
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.62B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.03
Change-$0.21 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.92B
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. FFAMX (9.62B). RLBFX (2.08) and FFAMX (2.04) have matching dividends . FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FFAMX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX (11.28) and FFAMX (10.76) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.22 vs. FFAMX (22.34).
| FFAMX | RLBFX | FFAMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.29 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.29 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.794 | 8.486 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.62B | 254B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 2.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | 11.28 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.75 | 31.88 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.34 | 38.22 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.86 | 67.40 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement