Ad is loading...
FFAMX vs RLBFX
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$19.76
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.28B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.48B
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. FFAMX (9.28B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFAMX: RLBFX (2.26) vs FFAMX (2.11). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FFAMX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FFAMX (20.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). FFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.04 vs. RLBFX (2.88). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. FFAMX (24.46).
| FFAMX | RLBFX | FFAMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.30 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.30 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.654 | -3.617 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 225B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 2.26 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.04 | 2.88 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.96 | 10.75 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.46 | 33.40 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.27 | 47.01 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers