Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFANX vs HBLAX
FFANX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFANX vs HBLAX
FFANX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFANX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFANX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FFANX (2.86B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FFANX: HBLAX (3.13) vs FFANX (2.37). FFANX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FFANX (19 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FFANX (0.53). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFANX (27.00). FFANX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FFANX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFANX: HBLAX (2000) vs FFANX (500). FFANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. HBLAX (1.22). FFANX return over 5 years is better than : 19.80 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| FFANX | HBLAX | FFANX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.89 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.89 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.998 | 4.076 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 3.13 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 1.22 | 685% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.33 | 19.75 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.80 | 4.63 | 428% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.03 | 39.00 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement