Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFANX vs HBLCX
FFANX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFANX vs HBLCX
FFANX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFANX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFANX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. FFANX (2.81B). HBLCX (2.49) and FFANX (2.43) have matching dividends . FFANX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FFANX (19 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FFANX (0.53). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFANX (27.00). FFANX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FFANX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFANX: HBLCX (2000) vs FFANX (500). FFANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. HBLCX (5.92). FFANX return over 5 years is better than : 23.56 vs. HBLCX (3.55).
| FFANX | HBLCX | FFANX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.65 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.65 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.306 | 4.096 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 11.3B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.43 | 2.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 5.92 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.49 | 17.01 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.56 | 3.55 | 664% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.24 | 32.98 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement