Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFANX vs HBLRX
FFANX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FFANX vs HBLRX
FFANX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFANX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFANX is a Buy and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FFANX (2.86B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FFANX: HBLRX (2.74) vs FFANX (2.37). FFANX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FFANX (19 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). HBLRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FFANX (0.53). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFANX (27.00). FFANX (0) and HBLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. HBLRX (0.88). FFANX return over 5 years is better than : 19.80 vs. HBLRX (2.74).
| FFANX | HBLRX | FFANX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.27 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.27 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.998 | 3.850 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 2.74 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 0.88 | 947% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.33 | 18.49 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.80 | 2.74 | 723% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.03 | 34.74 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers