Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFANX vs HBLSX
FFANX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FFANX vs HBLSX
FFANX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFANX vs. HBLSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFANX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FFANX (2.86B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FFANX: HBLSX (3.02) vs FFANX (2.37). FFANX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FFANX (19 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FFANX (0.53). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FFANX (27.00). FFANX (0) and HBLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. HBLSX (1.12). FFANX return over 5 years is better than : 19.80 vs. HBLSX (4.26).
| FFANX | HBLSX | FFANX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.96 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.96 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.998 | 3.987 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 3.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 1.12 | 748% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.33 | 19.56 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.80 | 4.26 | 464% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.03 | 38.33 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers