FFBC
Price
$30.82
Change
-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jun 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.23B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFNC
Price
$21.60
Change
+$0.02 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jun 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.13B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs SFNC

Header iconFFBC vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs SFNCBanner chart's image
FFBC vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. SFNC commentary
Jun 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Buy and SFNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2026
Stock price -- (FFBC: $30.83 vs. SFNC: $21.60)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 93% vs. SFNC: 95%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $3.23B vs. SFNC: $3.13B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.23B. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.70% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.70% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($3.24B) and SFNC($3.13B) have the same market capitalization . SFNC has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: SFNC (13.73) vs FFBC (10.89). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 25.347 vs. SFNC (15.907). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 380M vs. FFBC (171M). SFNC has less debt than FFBC: SFNC (762M) vs FFBC (1B). FFBC has higher revenues than SFNC: FFBC (962M) vs SFNC (126M).
FFBCSFNCFFBC / SFNC
Capitalization3.24B3.13B103%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.34715.907159%
P/E Ratio10.8913.7379%
Revenue962M126M763%
Total Cash171M380M45%
Total Debt1B762M131%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1112
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
3471
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (91) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (46) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (85) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOID41.411.02
+2.53%
KraneSharesGlHmndRbtc&PhysclAiIdxETF
XOP168.392.40
+1.45%
SttStrtSPDRS&POil&GasExplor&ProdtnETF
RFEM92.701.18
+1.29%
First Trust RiverFront Dyn Em Mkts ETF
KDEC27.710.11
+0.38%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Dec
HPI16.090.05
+0.31%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+0.09%
UCB - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
UBSI - SFNC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
FNB - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
AUB - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
CATY - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
More