FFBC
Price
$33.03
Change
+$0.08 (+0.24%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.47B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WSFS
Price
$79.88
Change
-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.08B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs WSFS

FFBC vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. WSFS commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Hold and WSFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FFBC: $33.03 vs. WSFS: $79.88)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 55% vs. WSFS: 83%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $3.47B vs. WSFS: $4.08B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.47B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than WSFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.93% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($4.08B) has a higher market cap than FFBC($3.47B). WSFS has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: WSFS (13.40) vs FFBC (11.67). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 45.736 vs. FFBC (34.292). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. FFBC (171M). WSFS has less debt than FFBC: WSFS (310M) vs FFBC (1B). WSFS has higher revenues than FFBC: WSFS (1.1B) vs FFBC (962M).
FFBCWSFSFFBC / WSFS
Capitalization3.47B4.08B85%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.29245.73675%
P/E Ratio11.6713.4087%
Revenue962M1.1B87%
Total Cash171M2.47B7%
Total Debt1B310M323%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2330
SMR RATING
1..100
3531
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3335
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSFS (73) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (30) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (31) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (35) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMEQ65.770.80
+1.23%
Nomura Focused Emerging Mrkts Eq ETF
CGBL38.220.14
+0.37%
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
NPFI25.880.01
+0.04%
Nuveen Preferred and Income ETF
PSCQ31.86N/A
N/A
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Oct) ETF
BABU11.02-2.30
-17.27%
Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+0.24%
UCB - FFBC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
CATY - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
PRK - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
UBSI - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
EFSC - FFBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
More