Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FSLBX
FFBFX vs FSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FSLBX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$30.91
Change+$0.43 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.19M
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$194.33
Change-$3.67 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
FFBFX vs FSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FSLBX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. FFBFX (52.2M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FSLBX (0.64) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FSLBX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FSLBX (40 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FSLBX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.83 vs. FFBFX (26.94). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 156.07 vs. FFBFX (34.36).
| FFBFX | FSLBX | FFBFX / FSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.950 | 9.032 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.2M | 1.45B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.94 | 28.83 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.28 | 93.24 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.36 | 156.07 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.26 | 206.99 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement