Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FSLBX
FFBFX vs FSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FSLBX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.21
Change-$0.35 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.94M
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$201.94
Change-$2.35 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
FFBFX vs FSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FSLBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.47B vs. FFBFX (49.9M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FSLBX (0.62) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FSLBX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FSLBX (40 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FSLBX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.92 vs. FFBFX (23.67). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 159.26 vs. FFBFX (25.41).
| FFBFX | FSLBX | FFBFX / FSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.518 | 11.202 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 1.47B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.67 | 31.92 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.24 | 79.93 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.41 | 159.26 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.52 | 185.55 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement