Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FSLBX
FFBFX vs FSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FSLBX
FFBFX vs FSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FSLBX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. FFBFX (49.1M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FSLBX (0.76) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FSLBX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FSLBX (41 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.66). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (10.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FSLBX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. FSLBX (-15.47). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.92 vs. FFBFX (-21.74).
| FFBFX | FSLBX | FFBFX / FSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.66 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.66 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.100 | -9.916 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.1M | 872M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.05 | -15.47 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.53 | 46.35 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.74 | 50.92 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.09 | 211.37 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers