Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FSPCX
FFBFX vs FSPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FSPCX
FFBFX vs FSPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FSPCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FSPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 625M vs. FFBFX (47.7M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FSPCX (1.70) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FSPCX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FSPCX (41 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.68). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSPCX (48.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FSPCX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. FFBFX (2.66). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.29 vs. FFBFX (-30.96).
| FFBFX | FSPCX | FFBFX / FSPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.68 | 278% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.68 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.721 | 6.664 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.7M | 625M | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.66 | 5.49 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.68 | 34.32 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.96 | 48.29 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.88 | 46.68 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement