Ad is loading...
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
Price$20.82
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.27
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. FFCMX (9.52B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than FFCMX: RLBAX (1.59) vs FFCMX (1.15). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (18 years) vs RLBAX (22 years). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FFCMX (20.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.84 vs. FFCMX (17.41). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.74 vs. FFCMX (18.43).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.083 | 15.007 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.52B | 240B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.59 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.41 | 23.84 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.69 | 10.27 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.43 | 33.74 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.59 | 47.38 | 46% |