Ad is loading...
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
Price$20.52
Change+$0.22 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.21B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.53
Change+$0.53 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.12B
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. FFCMX (9.21B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFCMX (1.40) vs RLBAX (1.28). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FFCMX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFCMX (12.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.55 vs. RLBAX (3.24). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.14 vs. FFCMX (24.12).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.917 | 0.096 | 959% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.21B | 234B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.28 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.55 | 3.24 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.65 | 18.25 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.12 | 35.14 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.79 | 43.52 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...