Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
Price$21.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.62B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.66
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.12B
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. FFCMX (9.62B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFCMX (1.34) vs RLBAX (1.17). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FFCMX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFCMX (12.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (10.54) and FFCMX (10.20) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.33 vs. FFCMX (18.24).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.521 | 8.064 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.62B | 253B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.17 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.20 | 10.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.92 | 28.37 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.24 | 32.33 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.57 | 56.64 | 59% |