Ad is loading...
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
Price$19.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.28B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$32.64
Change-$0.09 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.48B
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. FFCMX (9.28B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFCMX (1.37) vs RLBAX (1.27). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FFCMX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.33). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FFCMX (20.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.24 vs. RLBAX (1.76). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. FFCMX (19.76).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.33 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.33 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.911 | -3.908 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 225B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.24 | 1.76 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.61 | 8.00 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.76 | 27.60 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.41 | 38.50 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers