Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FFCMX (10.9B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFCMX (1.23) vs RLBAX (1.14). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FFCMX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFCMX (25.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.80 vs. FFCMX (13.32). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. FFCMX (14.31).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.32 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.32 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.105 | 9.354 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 279B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.14 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.32 | 16.80 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.94 | 42.23 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.31 | 31.17 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.46 | 77.06 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement