Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFCMX vs RLBFX
FFCMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBFX
FFCMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FFCMX (10.9B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFCMX: RLBFX (2.03) vs FFCMX (1.12). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFCMX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FFCMX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFCMX (25.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.73 vs. FFCMX (7.95). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.24 vs. FFCMX (10.35).
| FFCMX | RLBFX | FFCMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.30 | 523% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.30 | 533% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.436 | 9.992 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 283B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 2.03 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | 10.73 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 44.26 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.35 | 33.24 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.56 | 86.36 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers