Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFDKX vs GFACX
FFDKX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FFDKX vs GFACX
FFDKX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFDKX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFDKX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FFDKX (9.28B). FFDKX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FFDKX (0.54) vs GFACX (0.00). FFDKX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FFDKX (18 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FFDKX (0.34). FFDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). FFDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FFDKX (0) vs GFACX (250). FFDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.39 vs. GFACX (-2.39). FFDKX return over 5 years is better than : 59.58 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| FFDKX | GFACX | FFDKX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.35 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.35 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.969 | 8.529 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.39 | -2.39 | -351% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.97 | 34.46 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.58 | 3.85 | 1,546% |
| Returns for 10 years | 193.81 | 82.33 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers