Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFDKX vs GFAFX
FFDKX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FFDKX vs GFAFX
FFDKX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFDKX vs. GFAFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFDKX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FFDKX (9.19B). FFDKX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FFDKX (0.45) vs GFAFX (0.21). FFDKX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FFDKX (18 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FFDKX (0.34). GFAFX (32.00) and FFDKX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FFDKX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FFDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.88 vs. GFAFX (5.50). FFDKX return over 5 years is better than : 63.15 vs. GFAFX (17.03).
| FFDKX | GFAFX | FFDKX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.65 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.65 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.862 | 9.407 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.19B | 342B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.21 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.88 | 5.50 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.56 | 47.06 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.15 | 17.03 | 371% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.31 | 101.31 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers