Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFDKX vs GFAFX
FFDKX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FFDKX vs GFAFX
FFDKX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFDKX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFDKX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FFDKX (9.19B). FFDKX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FFDKX (0.45) vs GFAFX (0.20). FFDKX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FFDKX (18 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FFDKX (0.34). GFAFX (32.00) and FFDKX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FFDKX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FFDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.22 vs. GFAFX (11.44). FFDKX return over 5 years is better than : 69.45 vs. GFAFX (20.74).
| FFDKX | GFAFX | FFDKX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.65 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.65 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.589 | 8.490 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.19B | 361B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.20 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.22 | 11.44 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.54 | 46.22 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.45 | 20.74 | 335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.45 | 113.38 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement