Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFDKX vs RGACX
FFDKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFDKX vs RGACX
FFDKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFDKX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFDKX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FFDKX (9.19B). FFDKX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFDKX (0.45) vs RGACX (0.00). FFDKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFDKX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFDKX (0.34). RGACX (32.00) and FFDKX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFDKX (0) vs RGACX (250). FFDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.88 vs. RGACX (4.90). FFDKX return over 5 years is better than : 63.15 vs. RGACX (14.75).
| FFDKX | RGACX | FFDKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.93 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.93 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.862 | 9.193 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.19B | 342B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.88 | 4.90 | 283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.56 | 44.95 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.15 | 14.75 | 428% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.31 | 96.44 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement