Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs GBCIX
FFFMX vs GBCIX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs GBCIX
FFFMX vs GBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GBCIX (22.1M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: FFFMX (1.68) vs GBCIX (0.76). FFFMX was incepted earlier than GBCIX: FFFMX (6 years) vs GBCIX (22 years). GBCIX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). GBCIX (31.00) and FFFMX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: FFFMX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. GBCIX (4.69). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. GBCIX (1.64).
| FFFMX | GBCIX | FFFMX / GBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.69 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 9.481 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 22.1M | 533,937% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 0.76 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 4.69 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 16.29 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.56 | 1.64 | 2,530% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers