Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HWLZX (374M). HWLZX (1.76) and FFFMX (1.70) have matching dividends . FFFMX was incepted earlier than HWLZX: FFFMX (6 years) vs HWLZX (7 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: FFFMX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). HWLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.95 vs. FFFMX (10.83). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.08 vs. HWLZX (14.98).
| FFFMX | HWLZX | FFFMX / HWLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.123 | 8.793 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 374M | 30,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.76 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.83 | 19.95 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.21 | 30.17 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.08 | 14.98 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement