Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWLZX (372M). HWLZX pays higher dividends than FFFMX: HWLZX (1.78) vs FFFMX (1.68). FFFMX was incepted earlier than HWLZX: FFFMX (6 years) vs HWLZX (7 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: FFFMX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). HWLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.51 vs. FFFMX (9.57). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. HWLZX (22.52).
| FFFMX | HWLZX | FFFMX / HWLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 9.261 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 372M | 31,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.78 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 14.51 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 24.05 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.56 | 22.52 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement