Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFMX vs. HWLZX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFMX is a Buy and HWLZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWLZX (381M). FFFMX (1.66) and HWLZX (1.62) have matching dividends . FFFMX was incepted earlier than HWLZX: FFFMX (6 years) vs HWLZX (7 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: FFFMX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). HWLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.42 vs. FFFMX (5.44). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.87 vs. HWLZX (31.24).
| FFFMX | HWLZX | FFFMX / HWLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.995 | 16.051 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 381M | 30,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.62 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 14.42 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.95 | 31.01 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.87 | 31.24 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers