Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HWLZX (375M). HWLZX (1.70) and FFFMX (1.67) have matching dividends . FFFMX was incepted earlier than HWLZX: FFFMX (6 years) vs HWLZX (7 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: FFFMX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). HWLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.80 vs. FFFMX (9.80). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.37 vs. HWLZX (25.12).
| FFFMX | HWLZX | FFFMX / HWLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.877 | 11.398 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 375M | 31,467% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.70 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.80 | 17.80 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.67 | 21.72 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.37 | 25.12 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement