Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HWLZX (361M). HWLZX (1.76) and FFFMX (1.70) have matching dividends . FFFMX was incepted earlier than HWLZX: FFFMX (6 years) vs HWLZX (7 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: FFFMX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). HWLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.06 vs. FFFMX (9.94). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.91 vs. HWLZX (17.00).
| FFFMX | HWLZX | FFFMX / HWLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.672 | 5.120 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 361M | 32,410% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.76 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.94 | 14.06 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.43 | 25.30 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.91 | 17.00 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement