Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs RLCAX
FFFMX vs RLCAX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs RLCAX
FFFMX vs RLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFMX vs. RLCAX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFMX is a Buy and RLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RLCAX (226M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than RLCAX: FFFMX (1.67) vs RLCAX (1.10). FFFMX was incepted earlier than RLCAX: FFFMX (6 years) vs RLCAX (18 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: FFFMX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.20 vs. FFFMX (8.57). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. RLCAX (1.88).
| FFFMX | RLCAX | FFFMX / RLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.03 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.19 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.725 | 26.945 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 226M | 52,212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.10 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.57 | 21.20 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.94 | 37.91 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | 1.88 | 2,131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers