Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs RLCAX
FFFMX vs RLCAX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs RLCAX
FFFMX vs RLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RLCAX (209M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than RLCAX: FFFMX (1.68) vs RLCAX (1.15). FFFMX was incepted earlier than RLCAX: FFFMX (6 years) vs RLCAX (18 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: FFFMX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. FFFMX (9.57). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. RLCAX (1.08).
| FFFMX | RLCAX | FFFMX / RLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.03 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.19 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.487 | 19.977 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 209M | 56,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 18.97 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.38 | 31.93 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.56 | 1.08 | 3,852% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement